Skip to content

International Day of Action for Rivers 2017

March 7, 2017

In a week’s time, people across the globe will get together to celebrate the world’s rivers, and those who struggle to conserve and restore them. The International Day of Action for Rivers, held each year on the 14th March, is organised by the NGO International Rivers, and provides a focus for communities across the world to organise events celebrating their rivers, and highlighting the threats they face.

The International Day of Action for Rivers was originally adopted by the participants of the first International Meeting of People Affected by Dams, March 1997 in Curitiba, Brazil. Now a global event, the day is described by International Rivers as a focus to “raise our voices in unison against destructive water development projects, reclaim the health of our watersheds, and demand the equitable and sustainable management of our rivers.”

This year, there are many events to participate in across the world. In England, there is a volunteer day on the River Don in Sheffield supporting the Lower Don Valley Flood Defence Scheme through removing litter, debris and fly tipping from the river and its banks. In Germany, environmental artists will stage a ‘Flying Fish’ performance on the banks of the Elbe in Hamburg. In Russia, a lecture and masterclass on ‘How to know about river health’ will be held in Vladivostok.

In Iran, the Mountaineers Club of Qaemshahr will host a public visit to the Siahroud River for the purpose of identifying and documenting the river’s pollution. The Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum will host a 14-day campaign called the Sindh Peoples Caravan, a massive people’s assembly hosting thousands of people from fishing and peasant communities, civil society members, academia, government officials, media and other stakeholders, focused on the conservation of the Indus Delta. At Labrador in Canada, a ‘Snowmobile Ride for the Grand River’ will be held, bringing together communities and stakeholders around the Churchill (or ‘Grand’) River, which is threatened by the construction of hydropower plants.

As these selected examples show, the International Day of Action for Rivers gives communities around rivers across the world the forum to organise a wide variety of events, and to give their local environments a global focus. Rivers are self-evidently an inspiration and concern for diverse communities across the world, and next week’s events will help highlight their importance and threats.

You can view all the organised events (and propose one of your own) on the International Rivers Website.

Restoration of the Lippe River in Germany doubles fish populations

February 28, 2017

The restored Lippe River in Germany. Image: Benjamin Kupilas | REFORM

Writing in response to ongoing global biodiversity loss, the biologist EO Wilson optimistically stated in his 1992 book The Diversity of Life that “Here is the means to end the great extinction spasm. The next century will, I believe, be the era of restoration in ecology.” His prediction has broadly come true: in the subsequent 25 years, ecological restoration has become a central goal for many environmental managers and policy makers across the world seeking to alleviate the impacts of decades, if not centuries, of  human activity.

The forms that ecological restoration takes are increasingly informed and challenged by debates in ecology (e.g. non-equilibrium ecologies, state shifts and trophic cascades), social and cultural considerations (e.g. the appropriateness of ‘natural’ historical baselines, perceptual shifts to ‘living with’ environmental change), and ongoing climate changes (e.g. the imperative to ‘future-proof’ restored ecosystems with resilience to future climate shifts).

In freshwater systems, there are – as yet – few long-term studies of the ecological impacts of river restoration on aquatic biodiversity. Emerging research on multiple stressors (such as in the MARS project) demonstrates that the choosing restoration strategies is not a straightforward approach, as the removal of one stressor (e.g. fragmented flows) may cause alterations to the impact of others, either positively or negatively. New river restoration strategies are being implemented globally each year, and long-term studies on the successes and failures of existing restoration projects are thus extremely valuable resources.

In this context, a new study by researchers based in Germany and the USA examined the responses of fish communities to the restoration of the Lippe River in Germany over a 21 year period. The Lippe has been heavily modified by human activity since the early 1800s, with a largely reinforced and straightened channel and bed, highly fragmented flows as a result of numerous weirs, and the widespread destruction of its riparian and floodplain landscapes.

The research team analysed data collected for 4 years before, and 17 years after, restoration at Klostermersch, where two stretches totaling over 3km in length were restored in 1996 and 1997. Restoration involved reconnecting the river’s floodplain with the river, removing bank fixations, widening the river from 18 to 45 metres in width, building a series of small islands, introducing full trees as deadwood, and reintroducing ‘natural’ floodplain drainage systems. In essence, the Lippe River ecosystem was encouraged to become more diverse in structure and dynamic in process.


The Lippe was returned to more diverse and dynamic ecological conditions in the late 1990s. Image: Benjamin Kupilas | REFORM

Writing in a newly published study in Conservation Biology, the research team’s results show that this restoration management has led to a doubling of both fish species richness (i.e. the number of species) and abundance (i.e. the total species population sizes). On restored sections the Lippe, fish abundance exhibited an initial overshoot, where population numbers increased rapidly, then declined at a similar rate, as their numbers exceeded the ecosystem’s carrying capacity.

Both fish abundance and richness broadly stabilised around seven years after restoration at more than double the pre-restoration levels. However, there was (and is) significant variation in both abundance and richness from one year to the next. There are two environmental management insights here: first, that fish communities may take at least seven years to recover post-restoration and; second, that ongoing monitoring strategies are necessary to assess the impact of restoration strategies, as single sampling efforts may be skewed by annual variations.

The research team examined different traits of the fish species in the study, to understand if they played a role in how fish responded to restoration. They found that life history and reproduction related traits were influential. Opportunistic, short-lived fish species whose females reached maturity quickly and had multiple spawning runs each year most strongly increased in abundance, as a result of their ability to rapidly colonise new habitats. Such small-bodied fishes typically live in the dynamic in-stream and floodplain habitats that the Lippe restoration measures addressed.

As a result, the research team argue that focusing on fish species traits may help aid our understanding of how their populations are likely to respond to restoration measures. By relating restoration outcomes to such species traits, there is the potential to draw broader insights for restoration measures in other biogeographic regions, they suggest.

Höckendorff, S et al (2017) Characterizing fish responses to a river restoration over 21 years based on species traits, Conservation Biology, 10.1111/cobi.12908

Life in a Drop of Water: an interview with underwater photographer Liam Marsh

February 24, 2017

Freshwater shrimp in a drop of water. Image: Liam Marsh

Liam Marsh is an award-winning natural history and wildlife photographer based in the Blackdown hills of south Somerset in England. His photographs of aquatic life – both above and below the waterline – are creative, unusual, and often beautiful. We spoke to Liam to find out about his approaches to revealing freshwater worlds through photography.


Tell us about your work as a wildlife photographer: how did you get started, and what are you working on at the moment?

I have always loved photography, and as a process it encourages you spend more time examining the world around you. I’ve always found wildlife to be the perfect match for that approach. Photography has given met a set of tools with which to examine the many wonderful creatures that live around us. All of my images are a result of countless hours spent watching wildlife and getting to understand them. It’s something that I never grow tired of.

I really see my job as a way of discovering interesting subjects or behaviours, and then trying to capture them in a way that is both attractive and engaging to an audience. Hopefully through my images I can share some of the fascination and curiosity I feel when watching wildlife first hand.

For my latest project, I’m working on a short film about caddis fly larvae and how they go about constructing their protective casings underwater. Film is something relatively new to me but I’m really enjoying the ability to share stories in ways that photography can’t always achieve.


Caddis larvae casings. Image: Liam Marsh

Your photography in and around freshwater is stunning: what draws you to focus on rivers and lakes?

Thank you. I absolutely love spending time on or around water. There is always so much life and activity to be found in our freshwaters. There are challenges when working close to water, certainly, but I find these are far outweighed by the potential for interesting images.

I’m fascinated by the idea of this entire world that goes on almost without our knowledge, just below the water’s surface. It’s a thrill being able to show somebody a creature that lives so close and yet they may never have seen before.


Dragonfly larva in a drop of water. Image: Liam Marsh

What are some of your favourite aquatic species and habitats to photograph? Are you ever surprised by what you can see through a highly magnified lens?

I am always amazed by what I see through my lens. It doesn’t even have to be a very high magnification; even seeing the close up details of a familiar subject can be captivating. It’s that sense of wonder that keeps me motivated and inspired to create new images.

A favourite species of mine has to be dippers. They are such an interesting bird to watch, whether it’s the way they move or interact with each other: they are always active. In particular I love their connection to the water, they are so well adapted to their environment and yet behave unlike any other bird.

I can’t say that I have a particular favourite when it comes to habitat, but certainly I love looking at my local area. I’m fortunate enough to have travelled abroad several times taking photographs but nothing really compares to home. There is something special about uncovering the secrets of wildlife that live in your local area.

It’s easy to be dismissive of our local fauna and flora, there is always some larger, more flashy species abroad. But I think that some of the challenge involved in finding and learning about our local wildlife means that the encounters we have feel extra special.


Mayfly larva. Image: Liam Marsh

There’s two wonderful galleries of aquatic photographs on your website: Life in a Drop of Water, and Underwater Photography on the Tiverton Canal. Could you tell us a little about these projects, their processes, and what they’ve produced?

Both of these projects involved looking at the fresh water environments local to where I live in south Somerset. Using both still and moving image, the intention to was to try to show the sheer variety and complexity of life in these underwater habitats.

My most recent project ‘Life in a Drop of Water’ looks at the freshwater invertebrates that live in our streams and rivers. These species play a vital role in the health of our rivers and yet are so easily overlooked.


Mayfly larvae after moult, in a drop of water. Image: Liam Marsh

I collected samples from several local streams and brought the specimens back to my small studio. These are tiny subjects, measured in mm rather than cm, so it can be a slow fiddly process to photograph them. Being so small I was able to suspend them in droplets of water (hence the title), as they are unable to break the surface tension. From there I was able to set the lighting and composition for each photograph.

Ultimately the aim was to show how complex and beautiful the creatures are that exist in some of our smallest fresh water habitats. These streams are full of animals that each have their own captivating stories to tell.

So far I have had a very positive reaction from the local people who I’ve shown the photographs to. There is a genuine fascination that people have for these animals and as a photographer that’s encouraging.

A brown trout swims in the clear waters of the river test

A brown trout in the River Test, a chalkstream in southern England. Image: Liam Marsh

Can underwater photography influence how we think about environmental conservation and management, do you think?

Yes I hope so. I feel enormously privileged to spend the time that I do watching and learning about these animals and habitats. I understand that is not time afforded to everyone.

It can be difficult to encourage people to take an interest in conservation, especially when much of what needs to be saved is difficult to see or understand. Hopefully by seeing the richness and beauty of the life that surrounds us, people will be able to value and preserve it.


Caddis larva. Image: Liam Marsh

And finally, tell us about a ‘dream’ freshwater habitat you’d like to shoot in the future.

It might seem odd but I would really like to do more work on the rivers that run through our towns and cities. It would be great to try to dispel this idea that wildlife is reserved for the countryside. I think sharing the life that inhabits our rivers is a great way to do this.

In my experience, people are interested in wildlife but don’t always realise how accessible it is. If I could, in some small way, help people to see the importance of our rivers and how they themselves can help to preserve them, that would be fantastic.

Liam Marsh website

Small birds, big effects: the little auk transforms high Arctic ecosystems

February 15, 2017

Little Auk colony on the Cape York Peninsula, Greenland. Image: P Lyngs

The North Water Polynya is a large area of open sea in Baffin Bay between Greenland and Canada. The area is the largest polynya – an area of sea that remains ice free year-round, though surrounded by sea ice – in the world, and is one of the most biologically productive marine habitats in the Arctic Ocean.

Ecosystems on the Greenland coastline of the North Water Polynya are transformed – both positively and negatively – by nutrients brought back to land from the open sea by a tiny ‘ecosystem engineer’ bird, the little auk, according to a new study.

An estimated 30 million pairs of little auk travel to the North Water Polynya to breed each summer. At sea, they feed on nutrient-rich crustaceans called copepods. When they reach their breeding colonies on Greenland, the nutrients are largely excreted onto the land as guano.


The North Water Polynya. The study took place between Savissivik and Siorapaluk on the Greenland coast. Image: Wikipedia / NASA commons.

The impacts on the ‘fertilised’ Greenlandic landscape are significant. Areas of land outside bird colonies are largely barren with little vegetation, as is common in environments at 76º North. However, areas within bird colonies have lush vegetation and large numbers of grazing animals such as muskox and geese.

“Our study found that the little auk acts as an ecosystem engineer across a large area of North-West Greenland. The colonies stretch over a 400 km range and up to 10 km inland so a very large area is affected. This creates highly productive oases in an otherwise rather barren landscape” says researcher Thomas Davidson from Aarhus University, a co-author of the new study, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, which also involved MARS aquatic scientist Erik Jeppesen.

The research team undertook analyses of stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the coastal Greenland environment to track the flow of the marine-derived nutrients from sea to land. The research involved limnology, aquatic ecology, isotope biochemistry and bird tracking methods, and is part of the interdisciplinary NOW-project with anthropologists, archaeologists and local Inuit hunters.


Musk ox and their young grazing on the lush green landscapes created by the little auk colonies. Image: P. Lyngs

Freshwater ecosystems, on the other hand, were negatively affected by the little auk’s ecosystem engineering. The bird’s guano is very high in nitrogen which, in addition to acting as a fertiliser, can cause the acidification of freshwater. One Greenlandic lake close to a colony had a water pH 3.4, which is more acidic than acid rain.

As a result, lakes and rivers affected by little auk colonies can support few invertebrates and no fish. As there are few grazing aquatic organisms able to survive in the acidic conditions, the nutrient-rich lakes are often green and eutrophic. The presence of little auk colonies is therefore a significant stressor on Greenlandic lakes and rivers.

This reduction in freshwater biodiversity caused by little auk colonies is opposite to the efffect of similar transfers of marine nutrients by migrating Pacific salmon. Numerous studies have shown that migrating salmon significantly increase biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in their spawning rivers in North America and Asia, both through their post-spawning decomposition and as prey to predators like bears.


A local hunter from Savvissik waits with his net for a flock of little auk to pass by. Image: K. Johansen

Thomas Davidson summarises the study, “On a broad scale we sampled over 30 locations, both with and without bird colonies along the 400km coastline of the North Water Polynya, from Savissivik in the south to Siorapaluk in the north and demonstrated that both aquatic and terrestrial productivity is much higher in bird colony areas. We found that at least 85% of off all terrestrial and aquatic biomass was fuelled by nutrients brought to land by the little auk.”

Climate change may alter the ecosystem dynamics of coastal Greenland in the future. During the breeding season, little auks depend on nutrient-rich copepod species which live in cold sea waters. It is predicted that little auk populations will decline in response to the ongoing warming of the Arctic. If the little auk population declines, a significant shift in the Greenlandic coastal landscape around the North Water Polynya is likely to result.


Little Auks gathering on the stones before descending into their nests or before setting out to sea to feed and collect food for their young. Image: S. Wetterich

Whilst this may mean less productive terrestrial ecosystems, it could be that lakes and rivers become less acidic, and become more habitable for aquatic life. However, a new stressor – climate change – will likely have significant effects on Greenlandic freshwater ecosystems as the effects of the little auks recede.

The new study sheds new light on interactions between marine, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the Arctic, and reminds us that the impacts of future climate change are likely to be distributed in potentially unpredictable and surprising ways across inter-connected environments.

González-Bergonzoni, I et al (2017) Small birds, big effects: the little auk (Alle alle) transforms high Arctic ecosystems, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284: 20162572.

Largest freshwater Mediterranean lake may dry out in this century due to climate change and abstraction

February 10, 2017

The town of Beyşehir on the banks of Lake Beyşehir, Turkey. Image: Wikipedia Commons

Freshwater systems in the Mediterranean region are on the front line of climate change impacts in Europe. Future climate projections for the region indicate increasing air temperatures and decreasing precipitation rates through the 21st century.

Whilst fluctuations in water level and flow are a natural feature of freshwaters in the region, climate change is predicted to cause dramatic reductions in river flows and lake levels, causing severe water scarcity issues for the humans and non-humans that rely on them.

A new study suggests that if water abstraction rates from the region’s largest lake – Lake Beyşehir in Turkey – are not reduced, the lake will dry out in this century, potentially as early as the 2040s. The research, led by Tuba Bucak as part of the EU MARS and REFRESH projects, simulated the impact of future climate and land use changes on water levels in the lake.

Their models predict that increased temperatures and reduced rainfall coupled with ongoing water abstraction for agricultural irrigation place Lake Beyşehir at severe risk of drying out. If water abstraction rates are not reduced, the lake ecosystem and its rich biodiversity is likely to be significantly impacted (or even lost), and the human communities who rely on the lake for water and sustenance will lose the services and benefits the ecosystem provides.


A NASA satellite image of Lake Beyşehir. Image: Wikipedia Commons

All climate change scenarios (which used Representative Concentration Pathways) predicted a significant decreases in total water runoff into the lake (as a result of decreased rainfall), but the timescale of the decrease varied between the models. In comparison, simulated changes in land use had a minor impact on total runoff.

The decrease in water runoff common to each climate change scenario was projected to be more pronounced after the 2070s due to reduced precipitation and enhanced potential evapo-transpiration in the catchment. However, in one climate scenario modeled by the researchers, the lake was predicted to dry out completely by the 2040s.

The researchers write that despite the variance in their modelling results, that “a 9–60% reduction in outflow withdrawal was needed to prevent the lake from drying out by the end of this century.” In a water-scarce region, it would seem a challenging task for environmental managers and politicians to guide such a drastic change in water use.

However, there are precedents for similar large lakes to dry out. One Turkish lake, Lake Akşehir, has completely dried up in recent years, resulting in the extinction of the Central Anatolian Bleak.  Two other endemic fish species, the Eber Gudgeon and a local dace (Leuciscus anatolicus) are now critically endangered.

For Tuba Bucak, lead author of the study, water management in the region needs to undergo a significant shift if Lake Beyşehir is to be protected. She says,

“Mediterranean lakes may face a risk of drying out and losing their ecosystem service values in future if essential mitigating measures will not be taken into account. We need to implement adapting measures (eg. reducing water needs by promoting drought resistant crops and efficient irrigation technologies) for maintaining water sources in Mediterranean and ensure sustainable water usage in order to meet the future water demands.”

Seeking freshwater pandas: the ‘flagship umbrella species’ approach

February 3, 2017

European sturgeon (Acipenser sturio), a potential ‘flagship’ species which is threatened by pollution and habitat fragmentation. Image © A. Hartl

Freshwaters are amongst the most heavily modified global ecosystems, and the rich biodiversity they support is at a disproportionate risk of extinction. Conservation and restoration efforts aimed at protecting and improving freshwater habitats are being carried out across the world, but aquatic plants and animals remain amongst the most threatened components of global biodiversity.

One reason for this shortfall may be the lack of visibility – both literally and metaphorically – for freshwater life. Freshwaters may be murky, fast-flowing, deep, cold, ice-covered or turbulent, and the biodiversity they support can often be camouflaged, elusive and difficult to spot. The rich webs of animal and plant life below the surface of freshwaters are not as immediately perceptible as a wildflower meadow or a woodland, say. And, as the ‘shifting baseline’ concept illustrates, public and political perception of the health and diversity of ecosystems can significantly influence the support (or lack thereof) afforded to conservation and restoration schemes.

The identification of flagship species for aquatic ecosystems – so-called ‘freshwater pandas’ – may help bring threatened freshwater biodiversity ‘to life’ and increase awareness of, and support for, conservation measures, according to a new open-access study published in Conservation Biology. Flagship species were defined in 2000 by conservationists Nigel Leader-Williams and Holly Dublin as “popular charismatic species that serve as symbols and rallying points to stimulate conservation awareness and action.”

According to Dr Gregor Kalinkat from the Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) in Berlin, the lead author of the new study, a suite of over 60 potentially suitable freshwater ‘umbrella flagship species’ may help strengthen and target existing – but often inadequate – conservation efforts.


The yellow-winged darter (Sympetrum flaveolum), a highly ‘charismatic’ aquatic insect. Image: © André Karwath (CC BY-SA 2.5)

Flagship and umbrella species

Flagship species are typically ‘charismatic’ species which enthuse, enchant and intrigue public and political audiences with the natural world. Environmental geographer Jamie Lorimer provides a helpful typology of such non-human charisma, which may be ecological (the environmental ‘detectability’ of an organism, e.g. through a call), aesthetic (its sensory impact: e.g. cuddly, fierce, curious) and/or corporeal (its emotive impact; or, how it makes us feel). For Lorimer, these aspects of non-human charisma are combined designating flagship species for conservation. For example the human empathy and care often sparked by a panda’s ‘teddy bear’ looks and precarious life habits (surviving on nutrient-poor bamboo) has long been mobilised by the World Wildlife Fund as a flagship logo to leverage funding and support, both for the conservation of the forests on which it survives, and for threatened ecosystems worldwide.

In other words, the charisma (and in the panda’s case, this might include the simple black and white replicability of its form as a logo in a pre-digital age) of flagship species may be mobilised to help strengthen conservation efforts for other less charismatic or visible species across wider ecosystems, whether locally or globally. In this way, the flagship concept has resonances with the ‘umbrella species’ approach to conservation which aims to protect ecosystems through conservation measures targeted at a small number of ‘keystone’ species which also have ecological benefits to the wider ecosystem. However, the flagship species approach has historically been used to mobilise public awareness of nature, rather than to specifically target ‘umbrella’ ecological interactions.


The arapaima (Arapaima gigas), a ‘flagship’ fish native to the rivers and seasonal pools of Amazonia. Image: © T. Voekler (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Identifying ‘freshwater pandas’

The research team behind the new Conservation Biology study call for the established ‘flagship’ and ‘umbrella’ species concepts to be combined to define a new set of ‘flagship umbrella species’. According to the authors, such species have the potential to both raise public and political awareness of imperiled species and ecosystems, and to provide a focus-point for conservation efforts which will ‘trickle down’ and benefit wider ecological communities.

They identify over 60 potentially suitable freshwater flagship umbrella species, based on their “potential to attract public attention and funding for conservation programs as well as [their] potential to protect co-occurring biodiversity in all types of freshwater habitats.” The species – which were selected on the basis of their ‘flagship’ potential as identified in existing conservation literature – are extremely diverse and distributed across the world.

They include algae, molluscs (such as the freshwater pearl mussel), spiders endemic to peat bogs, crustaceans (such as the fairy shrimp), insects (including dragonflies and damselflies), a wide array of fish species (including sturgeon, stingray, sharks, salmonids, catfish and cod), amphibians (various frogs, toads and newts), reptiles (including turtles, crocodiles and alligators), birds (particularly cranes, pelicans and storks), and mammals (including otters, dolphins, porpoises and beavers) (see the full list here).

Some notable examples include: the baiji, a functionally extinct species of freshwater dolphin formerly found only in the Yangtze River in China; the European sturgeon, a migratory fish impacted by the fragmentation and pollution of large river basins such as the Danube; the Siberian crane a critically endangered bird with migration routes across the wetlands of Central and East Asia; and the freshwater pearl mussel, a mollusc threatened by water pollution and over-harvesting.


A flock of Siberian crane (Leucogeranus leucogeranus). Image: © Crane Wu

How useful might ‘freshwater pandas’ be, and where?

It could be argued that the idea of promoting freshwater flagship species is not new: after all, the image of the Atlantic salmon is regularly used to promote river restoration efforts across Europe, and the Eurasian beaver is proving an effective (if controversial) flagship species for public debates over the forms and functions of ‘rewilded’ river catchments in the UK. Similarly, a recent study by Nishikant Gupta and colleagues describes the ‘charismatic’ ability of the golden mahseer, a river fish endemic to northern India, in bringing together river users to support conservation of its habitat. In this context, a key question is: can flagship and umbrella species be (more) useful in supporting freshwater conservation efforts, and if so, how?

A 2011 review of the conservation literature around flagship and umbrella species by environmental geographer Maan Barua yielded three important insights: first, that existing flagship and umbrella species are predominantly mammals; second, that everyday language plays a vital role in communicating environmental issues through flagships; and third, that metaphors are important in shaping public understandings and responses to conservation messages. Barua discusses how ‘mobilising metaphors’ is thus a key consideration in selecting flagship species: in other words, how might different ‘charismatic’ natures (e.g. curiosity, fragility, beauty or ugliness) be aligned to a range of environmental issues to be communicated to wider public audiences; what conservation ‘work’ might they do in the world when circulating as metaphors and abstractions?

Whilst the authors of the Conservation Biology study don’t explicitly address the same issues for flagship species selection, similar considerations circle their work. As ever, scale matters: at what scales (local, regional, global) are flagship species likely to find an audience, and what conservation messages will these audiences be receptive to? Through what channels will flagship representations ‘travel’ (e.g. social media, television), and at what scale is any resulting funding or political influence likely to feedback to influence conservation outcomes? These are big questions which require interdisciplinary research and practice if the use of freshwater flagship species is to have positive conservation outcomes.


Freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera). Image: © Joel Berglund (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The promise of new data to support ‘flagship umbrella species’

In this context, the new Conservation Biology study outlines an approach to strengthen established ‘flagship’ and ‘umbrella’ species approaches by combining them, with the aid of new data gathering techniques. In other words, the authors envision the potential of ‘flagship umbrella species’ which can both leverage public support and awareness for conservation, and provide an ecological ‘umbrella’ for conservation measures which indirectly benefit wider ecological communities.

For example, molecular methods such as environmental DNA are improving swiftly, allowing researchers to determine the existence of fish or amphibian species from simple water samples, which in the past needed to be collected painstakingly by hand or using nets. Such methods offer the potential of developing our understanding of under-researched or ‘overlooked’ (as the authors put it) freshwater biodiversity across the world, and for targeted conservation measures to be developed, implemented and communicated.

The study’s lead author Gregor Kalinkat outlines the potential of new approaches, “To date, a disproportionately large amount of research and scientific data material has been collected on land and for marine species. In order to protect freshwater species, we are in urgent need of more comprehensive data, which can be collected both cost-effectively and extensively using innovative methods.”

The freshwater ‘flagship umbrella species’ approach is – like most conservation initiatives – inherently interdisciplinary: drawing together insights from the social sciences and humanities such as charisma and issue-framing, with cutting-edge scientific methods such as environmental DNA. Whether through ‘flagships’ or ‘umbrellas’, what is clear is that increasingly threatened freshwater ecosystems are in need of new beacons for conservation research, action and hope.

Read the open-access article ‘Flagship umbrella species needed for the conservation of overlooked aquatic biodiversity‘ in Conservation Biology here.

IGB Aquatic Biodiversity Research Group

Community habitat restoration on Burnley’s rivers

February 1, 2017

Urban rivers across Europe are subject to multiple stresses linked to the surrounding built environment, particularly pollution, fragmentation, barriers and habitat modification. However, increased focus on the many benefits of urban nature, coupled with the imperatives in the EU Water Framework Directive to improve such ‘heavily modified water bodies’ to ‘good ecological potential’ mean that urban river restoration projects are proliferating.

The rivers Brun and Calder meet in the town of Burnley, in North-West England, and are part of the wider Ribble catchment. Flowing through an urban landscape which has supported industrial activity for centuries, the Brun and Calder have both been heavily modified and impacted by humans. Long stretches of the rivers are enclosed by stone and concrete channels, and in some places the river beds are made up of the same cobblestones found paving old streets through the town.

A new video (which you can watch above) produced by The Ribble Rivers Trust documents the community-engaged habitat restoration of Burnley’s rivers undertaken through the Urban River Enhancement Scheme (URES).

The Ribble Rivers Trust is an environmental charity established in 1998 to protect and restore the rivers, streams and watercourses within the Ribble catchment and to raise public awareness of the value of local rivers and streams. The Trust was awarded over £600,000 by the Heritage Lottery Fund in 2013 to deliver the URES, which intends to improve the habitat quality and biodiversity of Burnley’s rivers, whilst engaging local communities through education and conservation programmes.

The video shows URES habitat improvement on Burnley’s rivers, removing litter and debris, uprooting invasive species such as Himalayan balsam, constructing fish passes on large weirs, and restructuring river beds to create semi-natural riffles and pools in place of the existing sewer-like channels. It shows the various ways in which local communities are consulted and engaged in this process, through school visits, environmental artworks and conservation action days.

Below is a podcast interview with MARS scientist Prof Steve Ormerod from Cardiff University, carried out on the banks of the River Brun. Steve – a Burnley native – gives us an insight into the ways in which urban nature, culture and heritage are entwined along the banks of Burnley’s rivers, and how such recent restoration projects have significantly improved their habitat quality and biodiversity.

Since the podcast was recorded, salmon parr have been found upstream of the town, an extremely encouraging sign that migratory salmon can now successfully navigate Burnley’s rivers to reach a wide area of upstream spawning grounds.

You can find out more about the Urban River Enhancement Scheme in Burnley here.

%d bloggers like this: